J. Robert Cox

553 citations
17 papers · 412 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

J. Robert Cox

17 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

J. Robert Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Philosophy 226
  • Literature and Literary Theory 155
  • Communication 83
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
  • Language and Linguistics 59
Replace David S Birdsell with:
David S Birdsell United States
Thomas M. Conley United States
James L. Golden United States
Bruce E. Gronbeck United States
John Poulakos United States
Wil A. Linkugel United States
Christian Erik J Kock Denmark
Eugene Garver United States
Richard M. Weaver United States
J. Michael Sproule United States
J. Robert Cox relative to David S Birdsell United States David S Birdsell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
David S Birdsell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Robert Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Robert Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Robert Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Robert Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Robert Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Robert Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Robert Cox. The network helps show where J. Robert Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside J. Robert Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Robert Cox Line = papers co-authored together J. Robert Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research.
1982231
2 198255
3 199023
4 198123
5 199016
6 197416
7 199116
8 20077
9 19966
10 19805
11 19743
12
Argument and social practice : proceedings of the Forth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation
19853
13 19752
14 19882
15 19742
16 20231
17 19871

About J. Robert Cox

J. Robert Cox is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Management Science and Operations Research and Strategy and Management, having authored 17 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (226 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (155 citations), Communication (83 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations) and Language and Linguistics (59 citations). J. Robert Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles Arthur Willard, Della Pollock, Gregg B. Walker and Rebecca Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Text and Performance Quarterly, Philosophy and Rhetoric, Communication Monographs and Journal of Applied Communication Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact