Thomas O. Beebee

725 citations
42 papers · 294 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas O. Beebee

26 papers receiving 151 citations

Peers

Thomas O. Beebee
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Literature and Literary Theory 122
  • Language and Linguistics 50
  • Anthropology 39
  • Museology 13
  • History 38
Replace Simon Dentith with:
Simon Dentith United Kingdom
William Keach United States
Renate Lachmann Germany
Yopie Prins India
Clare Brant United Kingdom
Tilottama Rajan Canada
Azade Seyhan United States
Douwe Wessel Fokkema Netherlands
Orhan Pamuk Belgium
Friedrich von Schlegel
Thomas O. Beebee relative to Simon Dentith United Kingdom Simon Dentith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Simon Dentith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas O. Beebee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas O. Beebee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas O. Beebee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas O. Beebee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas O. Beebee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas O. Beebee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas O. Beebee. The network helps show where Thomas O. Beebee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas O. Beebee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas O. Beebee Line = papers co-authored together Thomas O. Beebee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199781
2 201777
3 200032
4 199017
5 200317
6 201210
7 19949
8
Clarissa on the Continent: Translation and Seduction
19908
9
Transmesis: Inside Translation’s Black Box
20128
10 20065
11 20104
12 20103
13 19913
14
After Jena: Goethe's Elective Affinities and the End of the Old Regime
20112
15 20092
16 20072
17
Inside the black box of literary translation: transmesis
20072
18 20171
19
The Epistolary Politics of Amos Oz's Black Box
19981
20 20091

About Thomas O. Beebee

Thomas O. Beebee is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, History, Language and Linguistics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (3 papers), Literature, Culture, and Criticism (3 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (2 papers), Literature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies (2 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (122 citations), Language and Linguistics (50 citations), Anthropology (39 citations), Museology (13 citations) and History (38 citations). Thomas O. Beebee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James S. Baumlin, Linda S. Kauffman and Anke te Heesen. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Literature Studies, The German Quarterly, Comparative Literature, CLCWeb Comparative Literature and Culture and Text and Performance Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact