European Romantic Review

1.7k citations
798 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
  • History top 10%
    • Travel Writing and Literature
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
    • Scottish History and National Identity

Papers in

  • Literature and Literary Theory 331
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 134
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 39
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 38
  • History 187
    • Travel Writing and Literature 81
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 35
Top scholars
Daniel RobinsonAndrew ElfenbeinPamela ClemitIna FerrisTilottama RajanDiane Long HoevelerJeffrey N. CoxAndrew M. Stauffer

In The Last Decade

European Romantic Review

358 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

European Romantic Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Literature and Literary Theory 882
  • History 393
  • Museology 98
  • Anthropology 215
  • Cultural Studies 176
Replace Eighteenth-Century Fiction with:
Eighteenth-Century Fiction United States
The Wordsworth Circle United States
Nineteenth Century Contexts United States
Prose Studies United States
Nineteenth-Century Literature United States
Victorian Literature and Culture United States
Studies in eighteenth century culture India
Criticism United States
˜L'œesprit créateur France
Paragraph United Kingdom
European Romantic Review relative to Eighteenth-Century Fiction United States Eighteenth-Century Fiction's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Eighteenth-Century Fiction · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in European Romantic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Romantic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Romantic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Romantic Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in European Romantic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Romantic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Romantic Review.

About European Romantic Review

The 798 papers published in European Romantic Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in European Romantic Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (331 papers), History (187 papers), Museology (48 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (48 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (43 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (134 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (81 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (47 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (39 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (38 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (37 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (35 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Romantic Review are Daniel Robinson, Andrew Elfenbein, Pamela Clemit, Ina Ferris, Tilottama Rajan, Diane Long Hoeveler, Jeffrey N. Cox, Andrew M. Stauffer, Angela Esterhammer and Rosemarie Garland Thomson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers in Eighteenth-Century FictionBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in The Wordsworth CircleBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in Nineteenth Century ContextsBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in Prose StudiesBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in Nineteenth-Century LiteratureBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in Victorian Literature and CultureBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in Studies in eighteenth century cultureBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in CriticismBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in ˜L'œesprit créateurBreakdown of academic impact, for papers in Paragraph