Countries where authors publish in European Romantic Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Romantic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Romantic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Romantic Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in European Romantic Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in European Romantic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Romantic Review.
About European Romantic Review
The 732 papers published in European Romantic Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations . Papers published in European Romantic Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (309 papers), History (168 papers), Museology (44 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (42 papers) and Anthropology (81 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (122 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (71 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (43 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (38 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (36 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (35 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (31 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Romantic Review are Andrew M. Stauffer, Anne K. Mellor, Susan J. Wolfson, Tilottama Rajan, Daniel Robinson, David A. Simpson, Rei Terada, Thomas Pfau, Julie A. Carlson and Paul Youngquist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.