David Ε. Wellbery

31 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers

David Ε. Wellbery
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Literature and Literary Theory 103
  • Classics 33
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 34
  • Anthropology 60
  • Philosophy 57
Replace Morris Eaves with:
Morris Eaves United States
Thomas Huhn United States
Murray Krieger United States
Margaret Russett United States
Hugh Blair United Kingdom
Wulf Koepke United States
William Keach United States
Cleanth Brooks United States
Steven Knapp United States
D. N. DeLuna United Kingdom
David Ε. Wellbery relative to Morris Eaves United States Morris Eaves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Morris Eaves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ε. Wellbery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ε. Wellbery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ε. Wellbery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ε. Wellbery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ε. Wellbery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ε. Wellbery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ε. Wellbery. The network helps show where David Ε. Wellbery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ε. Wellbery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ε. Wellbery Line = papers co-authored together David Ε. Wellbery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198564
2 200040
3 199026
4 198526
5 199021
6 198420
7 198515
8 200311
9 200010
10 200910
11 19899
12 20148
13 20187
14 19997
15 19996
16 20106
17
Schopenhauers Bedeutung für die moderne Literatur
19985
18
Eine neue Geschichte der deutschen Literatur
20075
19
Traditions of experiment from the enlightenment to the present : essays in honor of Peter Demetz
19923
20 19862

About David Ε. Wellbery

David Ε. Wellbery is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Classics, Philosophy and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 53 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German Literature and Culture Studies (22 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (7 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (5 papers), Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (4 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (3 papers) and Art, Aesthetics, and Perception (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (103 citations), Classics (33 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (34 citations), Anthropology (60 citations) and Philosophy (57 citations). David Ε. Wellbery has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Bender, Erika Fischer‐Lichte, Günter Gebauer, H. B. Nisbet, Marshall Brown, David Simpson, Elinor Shaffer, Jon Klancher, David Perkins and Paul H. Fry. Their work appears in journals such as Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, The Modern Language Review, The German Quarterly, German Studies Review and MLN.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact