William J. Smith
Impact in
- Virology top 5%
- HIV Research and Treatment
- Plant Science top 2%
- Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Papers in
-
- Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes 13
- Cell death mechanisms and regulation 6
-
- Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity 35
- Co-authors
- John P. Formby (17 shared papers)Juan S. Bonifacino (5 shared papers)James H. Hurley (4 shared papers)Clark L. Gross (12 shared papers)O. Wolf Lindwasser (2 shared papers)Rittik Chaudhuri (2 shared papers)Clarence A. Broomfield (11 shared papers)Radharaman Ray (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cell Biology and Toxicology (7 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (3 papers)Economic Inquiry (2 papers)Journal of Virology (2 papers)Toxicology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaCameroon
In The Last Decade
William J. Smith
107 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
- Virology 169
- Plant Science 796
- Dermatology 129
- Cell Biology 250
- Insect Science 152
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Smith. The network helps show where William J. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 176 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 172 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 131 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 110 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 102 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 89 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 86 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 79 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 74 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 64 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 64 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 53 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 38 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 36 |
About William J. Smith
William J. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 114 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (35 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (13 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (6 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (6 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (6 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (169 citations), Plant Science (796 citations), Dermatology (129 citations), Cell Biology (250 citations) and Insect Science (152 citations). William J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include John P. Formby, Juan S. Bonifacino, James H. Hurley, Clark L. Gross, O. Wolf Lindwasser, Rittik Chaudhuri, Clarence A. Broomfield, Radharaman Ray, Dean S. Rosenthal and Cynthia M. Simbulan‐Rosenthal. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Biology and Toxicology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Economic Inquiry, Journal of Virology and Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.