John A. Bishop

1.4k citations
85 papers · 994 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Bishop

76 papers receiving 810 citations

Peers

John A. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Economics and Econometrics 592
  • Gender Studies 173
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 123
  • Sociology and Political Science 602
  • Safety Research 58
Replace Erich Battistin with:
Erich Battistin United Kingdom
Audra J. Bowlus Canada
Buhong Zheng United States
Shawn Kantor United States
Jukka Pirttilä Finland
Christian Belzil France
Jörg Baten Germany
Tony Atkinson United Kingdom
Martin Biewen Germany
Monica Singhal United States
John A. Bishop relative to Erich Battistin United Kingdom Erich Battistin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Erich Battistin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Bishop. The network helps show where John A. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John A. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together John A. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199177
2 198576
3 198963
4 199441
5 199136
6 199734
7 201332
8 200630
9 199230
10 199128
11 199527
12 199425
13 199822
14 199322
15 199421
16 200721
17 200019
18 199418
19 199718
20 197818

About John A. Bishop

John A. Bishop is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and General Health Professions, having authored 85 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Income, Poverty, and Inequality (50 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (20 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (20 papers), Economic theories and models (14 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (11 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (9 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (8 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (592 citations), Gender Studies (173 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (123 citations), Sociology and Political Science (602 citations) and Safety Research (58 citations). John A. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include John P. Formby, Paul D. Thistle, Buhong Zheng, William J. Smith, S. Chakraborti, K. Victor Chow, Haiyong Liu, William J. Smith, Feijun Luo and Xi Pan. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Economics and Statistics, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Economics Letters, Empirical Economics and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact