Cell Biology and Toxicology

1.7k papers and 39.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Cell Biology and Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Cell Biology and Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (847 papers), Cancer Research (352 papers) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (218 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (161 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (75 papers) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cell Biology and Toxicology are Isabella De Angelis, Giulia Ranaldi, Flavia Zucco, Annalaura Stammati, Kendall B. Wallace, Yula Sambuy, Maria Laura Scarino, Jessica M. Berthiaume, Michael Meredith and Halina Zaporowska.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cell Biology and Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cell Biology and Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cell Biology and Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Cell Biology and Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cell Biology and Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cell Biology and Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cell Biology and Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025