William Frey

27 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

William Frey
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Information Systems and Management 154
  • Media Technology 83
  • Safety Research 57
  • General Health Professions 72
  • Architecture 4
Replace Grant Fore with:
Grant Fore United States
Henk Zandvoort Netherlands
Matthew A. Holsapple United States
Rob M. Bielby United States
Kaija Pesso Finland
Daniel Bodén United States
Cecilia Jacobs South Africa
Roberta J. Herter United States
Conrad Katzenmeyer United States
Amy Childress United States
William Frey relative to Grant Fore United States Grant Fore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Grant Fore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Frey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Frey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Frey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Frey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Frey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Frey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Frey. The network helps show where William Frey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William Frey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Frey Line = papers co-authored together William Frey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200372
2 200548
3 200934
4 200826
5 200815
6 200813
7 200811
8 200410
9 200810
10 20066
11 20055
12 20124
13 20204
14
Technology and Ethics: Some Lessons in Puerto Rico.
19983
15 20103
16 20062
17 20132
18 20072
19
Implementing Bioeconomy with Electrobiorefinery
20162
20
Ethics of Team Work
20072

About William Frey

William Frey is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, General Health Professions, Media Technology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (18 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Education, Technology, and Ethics (2 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (154 citations), Media Technology (83 citations), Safety Research (57 citations), General Health Professions (72 citations) and Architecture (4 citations). William Frey has collaborated with scholars based in Puerto Rico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chuck Huff, Laura Barnard, Efraín O’Neill-Carrillo, Luís Ortiz Jiménez, Marla Perez‐Lugo, Alexander Golberg, Miguel Ángel Medina Torres, Marcel Castro-Sitiriche, Rafael A. Rodríguez–Solís and Chris Papadopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, Communications of the ACM, PS Political Science & Politics and Journal of Human Development and Capabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact