Grant Fore

21 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Grant Fore
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Information Systems and Management 128
  • Media Technology 110
  • Safety Research 55
  • Education 156
  • Architecture 5
Replace William Frey with:
William Frey Puerto Rico
Inês Direito United Kingdom
Matthew A. Holsapple United States
Roberta J. Herter United States
Warren Midgley Australia
Tracie Costantino United States
Meltem Alemdar United States
Marisa Exter United States
Dan Merson United States
Vanessa Svihla United States
Grant Fore relative to William Frey Puerto Rico William Frey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
William Frey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grant Fore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grant Fore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grant Fore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grant Fore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grant Fore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grant Fore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grant Fore. The network helps show where Grant Fore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Grant Fore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grant Fore Line = papers co-authored together Grant Fore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017204
2 201551
3 202027
4 202026
5 201913
6 202310
7
Quantifying interpersonal tendencies of engineering and science students: a validation study
20188
8 20197
9 20146
10 20205
11 20224
12 20233
13 20133
14 20203
15 20133
16 20162
17 20212
18 20241
19
An Introduction to the Integrated Community-Engaged Learning and Ethical Reflection Framework (I-CELER)
20181
20 20241

About Grant Fore

Grant Fore is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Media Technology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (6 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (4 papers), Career Development and Diversity (3 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (2 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (128 citations), Media Technology (110 citations), Safety Research (55 citations), Education (156 citations) and Architecture (5 citations). Grant Fore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Justin L. Hess, Mangilal Agarwal, Kody Varahramyan, Gabriel Filippelli, Joseph M. Wallace, Sharon Miller, Pratibha Varma‐Nelson, Mary F. Price, Anthony Chase and Julie A. Hatcher. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Anthropology Southern Africa, Journal of American College Health, Teaching and Teacher Education and International journal of engineering education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact