Chuck Huff

707 citations
26 papers · 483 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Chuck Huff

23 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Chuck Huff
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Information Systems and Management 172
  • Computer Science Applications 105
  • Safety Research 152
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Communication 37
Replace Nathan Beard with:
Nathan Beard United States
Harvey Mellar United Kingdom
Britte Haugan Cheng United States
Serkan Şendağ Türkiye
Irene T. Miura United States
Kelly Merrill United States
David Slavit United States
Silke Schworm Germany
Cathy Ringstaff United States
Nicole Shechtman United States
Chuck Huff relative to Nathan Beard United States Nathan Beard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nathan Beard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chuck Huff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chuck Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chuck Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chuck Huff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chuck Huff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chuck Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chuck Huff. The network helps show where Chuck Huff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Chuck Huff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chuck Huff Line = papers co-authored together Chuck Huff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199579
2 199669
3 200548
4
Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in Its Place
199439
5 200238
6 199837
7 200826
8 199625
9 200815
10 201413
11 199613
12
Toward a design ethic for computing professionals
199411
13 199611
14 200311
15 199610
16 199610
17 20098
18 20145
19 20084
20 20034

About Chuck Huff

Chuck Huff is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Science Applications, having authored 26 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (172 citations), Computer Science Applications (105 citations), Safety Research (152 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations) and Communication (37 citations). Chuck Huff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include C. Dianne Martin, William Frey, Keith Miller, Don Gotterbarn, Thomas A. Finholt, Nicholas Epley, Laura Barnard, Deborah G. Johnson, Sara Baase and Rob Kling. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Communications of the ACM, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society and Education and Information Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact