William Fox

28 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

William Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Music 58
  • Public Administration 25
  • Literature and Literary Theory 59
  • Communication 34
  • Gender Studies 36
Replace Nathan Wright with:
Nathan Wright United States
David Trend United States
Cheryl Hardy United Kingdom
Russell Rickford United States
Rina Benmayor United States
Jeffrey T. Nealon United States
Jennifer C. Mueller United States
Alberto González United States
Frances R. Aparicio Portugal
Mimi Thi Nguyen United States
William Fox relative to Nathan Wright United States Nathan Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Nathan Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Fox. The network helps show where William Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside William Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Fox Line = papers co-authored together William Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197443
2 197541
3 197833
4
Religion and occupational achievement.
197027
5 197626
6 200123
7 198120
8 198716
9 197015
10 197713
11 202010
12 19809
13 19737
14 19757
15 19777
16
Computerized Creation and Diffusion of Folkloric Materials
19835
17
Supportive care for women with breast cancer living in rural Australia
20174
18 19754
19 19823
20 19773

About William Fox

William Fox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Music, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 31 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Music History and Culture (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (58 citations), Public Administration (25 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (59 citations), Communication (34 citations) and Gender Studies (36 citations). William Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William W. Philliber, James D. Williams, Elton F. Jackson, Harry J. Crockett, Fred D. Davis, I. V. Khudyakov, Paul S. Smith, David E. Payne, Puneet Dwivedi and Sarah J. Welch. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Sociological Quarterly, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Western Folklore and Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact