William Fox

25 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

William Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Music 57
  • Public Administration 25
  • Literature and Literary Theory 58
  • Communication 29
  • Gender Studies 34
Replace Nathan Wright with:
Nathan Wright United States
Russell Rickford United States
Edith Kurzweil United States
Rina Benmayor United States
William F. Danaher United States
Cheryl Hardy United Kingdom
Jake Burdick United States
Alberto González United States
Frances R. Aparicio Portugal
Aaron Schutz United States
William Fox relative to Nathan Wright United States Nathan Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Nathan Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Fox. The network helps show where William Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside William Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Fox Line = papers co-authored together William Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197541
2 197440
3 197831
4 197626
5
Religion and occupational achievement.
197024
6 200121
7 198120
8 198714
9 197713
10 197012
11 20209
12 19809
13 19737
14 19777
15 19757
16
Supportive care for women with breast cancer living in rural Australia
20174
17 19754
18 19833
19
Computerized Creation and Diffusion of Folkloric Materials
19833
20 19773

About William Fox

William Fox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Music, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication, having authored 29 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Music History and Culture (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Photopolymerization techniques and applications (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (57 citations), Public Administration (25 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (58 citations), Communication (29 citations) and Gender Studies (34 citations). William Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William W. Philliber, James D. Williams, Elton F. Jackson, Harry J. Crockett, Fred D. Davis, I. V. Khudyakov, Paul S. Smith, David E. Payne, Puneet Dwivedi and Sarah J. Welch. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Sociological Quarterly, Western Folklore and Youth & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact