Nathan Wright

407 citations
11 papers · 277 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Wright

11 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Nathan Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Library and Information Sciences 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 183
  • Urban Studies 21
  • Music 11
  • Communication 24
Replace Jennifer C. Mueller with:
Jennifer C. Mueller United States
Keith A. Roberts United States
David Trend United States
Stanisław Ossowski United States
Barbara Scott Winkler United States
Jason L. Mast Germany
Martin Bloomer United Kingdom
Holly Randell‐Moon Australia
Susanne Francisco Australia
Lisa Weems United States
Nathan Wright relative to Jennifer C. Mueller United States Jennifer C. Mueller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Jennifer C. Mueller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Wright. The network helps show where Nathan Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Wright Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200584
2 200457
3 200337
4
Let's work together
196830
5 200420
6 196919
7 196914
8 20136
9
Black power and urban unrest : creative possibilities
19675
10 19694
11 20211

About Nathan Wright

Nathan Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Health and Food Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (183 citations), Urban Studies (21 citations), Music (11 citations) and Communication (24 citations). Nathan Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Griswold, Terry R. McDonnell, Jeff Manza, Milton L. Barron, Charles V. Hamilton, Stokely Carmichael, Michael Westaway and Richard H. Jr. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Religious Research, American Sociological Review, Annual Review of Sociology, Japan focus and American Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact