William Finlay

38 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

William Finlay
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Public Administration 143
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 208
  • Gender Studies 103
  • Museology 26
  • Strategy and Management 111
Replace Leo McCann with:
Leo McCann United Kingdom
Tim Strangleman United Kingdom
Edward Granter United Kingdom
Michael Rose United Kingdom
Steve Williams United Kingdom
Bob Russell Australia
John C. Lammers United States
Terence J. Johnson United Kingdom
April L. Wright Australia
Hans Doorewaard Netherlands
William Finlay relative to Leo McCann United Kingdom Leo McCann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Leo McCann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Finlay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Finlay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Finlay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Finlay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Finlay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Finlay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Finlay. The network helps show where William Finlay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Finlay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Finlay Line = papers co-authored together William Finlay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989149
2 198474
3 199562
4 200562
5 198655
6 200040
7 200639
8 198937
9 199835
10 200331
11 200426
12 200625
13 199423
14 198323
15 199923
16 199521
17 198921
18 200915
19 200714
20 201813

About William Finlay

William Finlay is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions and Public Administration, having authored 42 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (143 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (208 citations), Gender Studies (103 citations), Museology (26 citations) and Strategy and Management (111 citations). William Finlay has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James E. Coverdill, Ronald M. Pavalko, Ashley Mears, Tom Juravich, Hugh Scullion, Paul Edwards, Jack Martin, Terry C. Blum, Paul M. Roman and Mary Ann Clawson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Sociological Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, Work and Occupations and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact