William F. Wright

2.1k citations
32 papers · 1.6k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

William F. Wright

29 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William F. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Decision Sciences 377
  • Accounting 681
  • Finance 442
  • Applied Psychology 94
  • Strategy and Management 255
Replace Rob Ranyard with:
Rob Ranyard United Kingdom
Lyle Brenner United States
Jörg Oechssler Germany
Russell Golman United States
Juan D. Carrillo United States
Manoj Thomas United States
Björn Bartling Switzerland
José Apesteguía Spain
Ilan Fischer Israel
Ofer H. Azar Israel
William F. Wright relative to Rob Ranyard United Kingdom Rob Ranyard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.0×
Rob Ranyard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William F. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Wright. The network helps show where William F. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside William F. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William F. Wright Line = papers co-authored together William F. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992483
2 1979360
3 1989201
4 198872
5 198259
6 201254
7 198844
8 198035
9 201134
10 200132
11 197932
12
The Regulation of Public Company Auditing: Evidence from the Transition to AS5
201022
13 197719
14 197717
15 199916
16 201115
17 202112
18 198810
19 201610
20 19768

About William F. Wright

William F. Wright is a scholar working on Accounting, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (15 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (377 citations), Accounting (681 citations), Finance (442 citations), Applied Psychology (94 citations) and Strategy and Management (255 citations). William F. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gordon H. Bower, Urton Anderson, William H. Beaver, Roger Clarke, Ken T. Trotman, L. L. Berger, Ira Solomon, Rodney E. Smith, Clara Xiaoling Chen and John J. Willingham. Their work appears in journals such as Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory, Accounting Organizations and Society, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Accounting Research and The Journal of Finance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact