William Brown

58 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Public Administration 1.1k
  • Industrial relations 174
  • Safety Research 181
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 189
  • Economics and Econometrics 255
Replace Chris Howell with:
Chris Howell United States
Allan D. Flanders United Kingdom
Franz Traxler Austria
Guglielmo Meardi United Kingdom
Ian Greer United States
Christoph Deutschmann Germany
Michael J. F. Poole United Kingdom
Óscar Molina Romo Spain
Maarten Keune Netherlands
Robert J. Flanagan United States
William Brown relative to Chris Howell United States Chris Howell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Chris Howell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brown. The network helps show where William Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Brown Line = papers co-authored together William Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Industrial relations : theory and practice
2003262
2
The evolution of the modern workplace
2009174
3 1982161
4 2000128
5 199068
6 200468
7 201462
8 200258
9 201347
10 201446
11 200345
12 200042
13 197538
14 198336
15 199334
16 201334
17 200832
18 197630
19 198828
20 198627

About William Brown

William Brown is a scholar working on Public Administration, Industrial relations, Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (48 papers), Legal and Labor Studies (12 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (8 papers), Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies (6 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (3 papers), Labor Law and Work Dynamics (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper) and Human Resource and Talent Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (1.1k citations), Industrial relations (174 citations), Safety Research (181 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (189 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (255 citations). William Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Oxenbridge, Paul Marginson, Janet T. Walsh, V. L. Allen, Simon F. Deakin, Keith Whitfield, John Forth, Alex Bryson, Sushil B. Wadhwani and Peter Nolan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Industrial Relations, Journal of Industrial Relations, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Employee Relations and Industrial Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact