Studies in European Cinema

271 papers and 323 indexed citations i.

About

The 271 papers published in Studies in European Cinema in the last decades have received a total of 323 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in European Cinema usually cover Economics and Econometrics (136 papers), Sociology and Political Science (133 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (74 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (134 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (76 papers) and European history and politics (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in European Cinema are Wendy Everett, David Forrest, Michael Cowan, Sarah Cooper, Helen Jones, Frederik Dhaenens, Thomas Bauer, Kristyn Gorton, Malte Hagener and Jared Gardner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in European Cinema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in European Cinema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in European Cinema.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in European Cinema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in European Cinema. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in European Cinema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in European Cinema more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025