William B. Thomas

44 papers receiving 976 citations

Peers

William B. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Small Animals 297
  • Equine 41
  • Neurology 70
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 106
Replace Marc Kent with:
Marc Kent United States
Cleta Sue Bailey United States
Thomas Flegel Germany
Sònia Añor Spain
Benjamin D. Young United States
Martin Konar Switzerland
Sibylle Kneissl Austria
Kiichi KANAYAMA Japan
Kimberly A. Greer United States
Shannon P. Holmes United States
William B. Thomas relative to Marc Kent United States Marc Kent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marc Kent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William B. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Thomas. The network helps show where William B. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William B. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William B. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together William B. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200984
2 199678
3 200976
4 199164
5 200062
6 199952
7 199852
8 200051
9 201140
10 200140
11 200938
12 199638
13 200137
14 199735
15 200035
16 199731
17 201422
18 199320
19 200020
20 200818

About William B. Thomas

William B. Thomas is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Education and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (12 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (5 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers) and Barrier Structure and Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (297 citations), Equine (41 citations), Neurology (70 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (135 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (106 citations). William B. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Silke Hecht, Donald C. Sorjonen, Joe N. Kornegay, William Adams, Stephen T. Simpson, Simon J. Wheeler, Robert W. Kramer, Nicholas Sharp, Luisa De Risio and Μ. D. McGavin. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Surgery and American Educational Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact