Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound

2.9k papers and 42.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound in the last decades have received a total of 42.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound usually cover Surgery (1.1k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (986 papers) and Small Animals (781 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Oncology Research (603 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (446 papers) and Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (414 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound are Christopher R. Lamb, Donald Ε. Thrall, Dominique G. Penninck, Robert M. Kirberger, Robert T. O’Brien, Erik R. Wisner, Tobias Schwarz, Ruth Dennis, Sue Dyson and Amy S. Tidwell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound.

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025