Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Surgery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Surgery.
About Veterinary Surgery
The 4.4k papers published in Veterinary Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 83.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Veterinary Surgery usually cover Equine (827 papers), Small Animals (1.4k papers), Surgery (960 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (427 papers) and Urology (82 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (1.0k papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (827 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (290 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (189 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (188 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (143 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (138 papers) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Surgery are D. N. Aron, Dorothy Cimino Brown, James L. Cook, Randy J. Boudrieau, Philipp D. Mayhew, Noel Fitzpatrick, Antonio Pozzi, Karl F. Bowman, Dominique J. Griffon and Daniel D. Lewis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.