Wen‐Chi Foo

41 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Wen‐Chi Foo
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Urology 71
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 153
  • Cancer Research 72
  • Oncology 121
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 134
Replace Jacques Monteil with:
Jacques Monteil France
Hendrik Bolte Germany
Tito Poli Italy
Adilson Prando Brazil
Thomas D. Shellenberger United States
James V. Ferris United States
Chi Lai United States
Dominik Nörenberg Germany
Ali Amin United States
Wen‐Chi Foo relative to Jacques Monteil France Jacques Monteil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jacques Monteil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wen‐Chi Foo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wen‐Chi Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wen‐Chi Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wen‐Chi Foo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wen‐Chi Foo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wen‐Chi Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wen‐Chi Foo. The network helps show where Wen‐Chi Foo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wen‐Chi Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wen‐Chi Foo Line = papers co-authored together Wen‐Chi Foo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201991
2 201559
3 201057
4 201153
5 201051
6 201638
7 201134
8 201630
9 201826
10 200925
11 201025
12 201722
13 201922
14 201221
15 202021
16 202020
17 200819
18 201018
19 202115
20 202112

About Wen‐Chi Foo

Wen‐Chi Foo is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 43 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (7 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (71 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (153 citations), Cancer Research (72 citations), Oncology (121 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (134 citations). Wen‐Chi Foo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Polascik, Kathryn R. Nightingale, Mark L. Palmeri, John F. Madden, Liang Zhai, Vladimir Mouraviev, Vickie Y. Jo, Jeffrey F. Krane, John A. Papalas and Stanley J. Robboy. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Cytopathology, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Diagnostic Cytopathology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact