Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

8.7k papers and 216.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.7k papers published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology in the last decades have received a total of 216.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology usually cover Biomedical Engineering (3.8k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.6k papers) and Surgery (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (2.7k papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (2.3k papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology are Kullervo Hynynen, Douglas L. Miller, J. Ophir, Robert W. Gill, Gail ter Haar, Kevin J. Parker, Nico de Jong, J. Brian Fowlkes, Kathryn R. Nightingale and F. Stuart Foster.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025