Wei‐Ting Tseng

34 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Wei‐Ting Tseng
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 45
  • Immunology 62
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 50
  • Food Science 34
  • Biological Psychiatry 4
Replace Min Ji Son with:
Min Ji Son South Korea
David O. Clarke United States
Şule Bulut Türkiye
Jiachen Lu China
Danielle Brown United States
Zhenwei Yu China
Caroline J. Tuck Australia
Meng Liu China
Chia-Der Lin Taiwan
Wei‐Ting Tseng relative to Min Ji Son South Korea Min Ji Son's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Min Ji Son · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei‐Ting Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei‐Ting Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei‐Ting Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei‐Ting Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei‐Ting Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei‐Ting Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei‐Ting Tseng. The network helps show where Wei‐Ting Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei‐Ting Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei‐Ting Tseng Line = papers co-authored together Wei‐Ting Tseng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201978
2 201568
3 201627
4 201624
5 201621
6 202121
7 201919
8 202317
9 202116
10 202114
11 202013
12 201412
13 20209
14 20159
15 20219
16 20168
17 20208
18 20227
19 20215
20 20185

About Wei‐Ting Tseng

Wei‐Ting Tseng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (3 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (2 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Biochemical and biochemical processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (45 citations), Immunology (62 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (50 citations), Food Science (34 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (4 citations). Wei‐Ting Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Tzu‐Ming Pan, Ya-Wen Hsu, Liang‐Jen Wang, Chi‐Fa Hung, Pao‐Yen Lin, Jenny P.‐Y. Ting, I‐Chien Wu, Liang Chen, Jason W. Tam and Haitao Guo. Their work appears in journals such as Aging, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Maturitas and Cancer Management and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact