Fu‐Min Fang

178 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Fu‐Min Fang
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Otorhinolaryngology 1.3k
  • Oncology 878
  • Radiation 303
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 978
  • Periodontics 131
Replace Sarah Jefferies with:
Sarah Jefferies United Kingdom
Giuseppe Sanguineti Italy
Primož Strojan Slovenia
Dian Wang United States
Harry Quon United States
Peter A.S. Johnstone United States
Mark C. Weissler United States
Sang-wook Lee South Korea
G. Brandon Gunn United States
Chaosu Hu China
Fu‐Min Fang relative to Sarah Jefferies United Kingdom Sarah Jefferies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Sarah Jefferies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fu‐Min Fang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fu‐Min Fang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fu‐Min Fang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fu‐Min Fang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fu‐Min Fang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fu‐Min Fang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fu‐Min Fang. The network helps show where Fu‐Min Fang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fu‐Min Fang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fu‐Min Fang Line = papers co-authored together Fu‐Min Fang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008169
2 1998139
3 2004138
4 2000138
5 2005129
6 2015120
7 2002115
8 2005108
9 2011101
10 201693
11 201486
12 200686
13 201186
14 200985
15 201584
16 200882
17 200479
18 200774
19 201172
20 200866

About Fu‐Min Fang

Fu‐Min Fang is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (59 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (12 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (9 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (7 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (1.3k citations), Oncology (878 citations), Radiation (303 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (978 citations) and Periodontics (131 citations). Fu‐Min Fang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chih‐Yen Chien, Chong‐Jong Wang, Hsuan‐Chih Hsu, Wen‐Ling Tsai, Stephen Wan Leung, Tsair-Fwu Lee, Ching‐Yeh Hsiung, Pei‐Ju Chao, Hui‐Ching Chuang and Eng‐Yen Huang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Head & Neck, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Cancer Management and Research and Cancers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact