Wei-Hsin Lu

27 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Wei-Hsin Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Clinical Psychology 303
  • Health 72
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Modeling and Simulation 35
  • Social Psychology 157
Replace Laura Salerno with:
Laura Salerno Italy
Leia Y. Saltzman United States
Ji Hyun Lee United States
Julia Große Germany
Candi M C Leung Hong Kong
Sheena Taha Canada
Rahmeth Radjack France
Osea Giuntella United States
Mariyana Schoultz United Kingdom
Maitane Picaza Gorrotxategi Spain
Wei-Hsin Lu relative to Laura Salerno Italy Laura Salerno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Laura Salerno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei-Hsin Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei-Hsin Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei-Hsin Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei-Hsin Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei-Hsin Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei-Hsin Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei-Hsin Lu. The network helps show where Wei-Hsin Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei-Hsin Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei-Hsin Lu Line = papers co-authored together Wei-Hsin Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020106
2 2020103
3 202078
4 202054
5 202037
6 202035
7 202030
8 201727
9 202025
10 202123
11 201923
12 201921
13 202019
14 202016
15 202014
16 202114
17 202014
18 201913
19 202012
20 202010

About Wei-Hsin Lu

Wei-Hsin Lu is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 718 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (8 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (303 citations), Health (72 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), Modeling and Simulation (35 citations) and Social Psychology (157 citations). Wei-Hsin Lu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Cheng‐Fang Yen, Yu‐Ping Chang, Nai‐Ying Ko, Peng‐Wei Wang, Yi‐Lung Chen, Dian‐Jeng Li, Ray C. Hsiao, Huei‐Fan Hu, Chang‐Chun Chen and Mu‐Hong Chen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Brain Behavior and Immunity and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact