Wei‐Chen Lin

51 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Wei‐Chen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Biological Psychiatry 125
  • Pharmacology 181
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 30
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 120
  • Neurology 65
Replace Maura Furey with:
Maura Furey United States
Martin J. Lan United States
Najate Ojeil United States
David P. Weinzimmer United States
Chris A. Kelly United States
Georg‐Alexander Becker Germany
Harry Rubin‐Falcone United States
Gregory Miles James Austria
Jeff Meyer Canada
P Yuan United States
Wei‐Chen Lin relative to Maura Furey United States Maura Furey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Maura Furey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei‐Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei‐Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei‐Chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei‐Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei‐Chen Lin. The network helps show where Wei‐Chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei‐Chen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei‐Chen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Wei‐Chen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016131
2 2019127
3 201240
4 202333
5 200831
6 201230
7 201629
8 202121
9 201819
10 201417
11 202213
12 202312
13 202212
14 202111
15 202410
16 20219
17 20219
18 20238
19 20228
20 20238

About Wei‐Chen Lin

Wei‐Chen Lin is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 56 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (14 papers), Graphene research and applications (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (6 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (4 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (125 citations), Pharmacology (181 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (30 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations) and Neurology (65 citations). Wei‐Chen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Cheng‐Ta Li, Mu‐Hong Chen, Kai‐Chun Yang, Pei‐Chi Tu, Ya‐Mei Bai, Tung‐Ping Su, Shih‐Jen Tsai, Bang‐Hung Yang, Chen‐Jee Hong and Tung‐Ping Su. Their work appears in journals such as Nanotechnology, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Psychiatric Research, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact