Chih‐Ming Cheng

94 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Chih‐Ming Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Biological Psychiatry 303
  • Neurology 366
  • Pharmacology 460
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 90
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 240
Replace Tung‐Ping Su with:
Tung‐Ping Su Taiwan
Daniel Drake United States
Guo‐Rong Wu China
Lei Ding United States
Tomáš Hájek Canada
D. Lyons United Kingdom
Jamie Sleigh New Zealand
Daniel Walker United Kingdom
Mauro Manconi Italy
Chih‐Ming Cheng relative to Tung‐Ping Su Taiwan Tung‐Ping Su's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Tung‐Ping Su · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Ming Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Ming Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Ming Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Ming Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Ming Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Ming Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Ming Cheng. The network helps show where Chih‐Ming Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih‐Ming Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih‐Ming Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Chih‐Ming Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017171
2 2018117
3 201589
4 201982
5 201872
6 201967
7 201865
8 201965
9 202060
10 201052
11 201750
12 201449
13 201946
14 201545
15 202041
16 198940
17 202033
18 199929
19 201828
20 199227

About Chih‐Ming Cheng

Chih‐Ming Cheng is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (23 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (14 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (4 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (303 citations), Neurology (366 citations), Pharmacology (460 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (90 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (240 citations). Chih‐Ming Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheng‐Ta Li, Ya‐Mei Bai, Tung‐Ping Su, Mu‐Hong Chen, Shih‐Jen Tsai, Pei-Chi Tu, Chen-Jee Hong, Tzeng‐Ji Chen, Wen‐Han Chang and Ahsan Kareem. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Asian Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact