Wanda Fields

651 citations
22 papers · 575 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 9
    • NF-κB Signaling Pathways 2
    • Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress 6
    • Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms 5

Wanda Fields

22 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Wanda Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cancer Research 182
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 129
  • Molecular Biology 259
  • Pharmacology 28
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 88
Replace D. Lovell with:
D. Lovell United Kingdom
Feng Han China
Xiaoting Mo China
Yuan Liang China
André van Helvoort Lengert Brazil
Tsung‐Ho Ying Taiwan
Houda Alatassi United States
Xiaomin Dang China
Janet Petruska United States
M Jakab Hungary
Wanda Fields relative to D. Lovell United Kingdom D. Lovell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
D. Lovell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wanda Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wanda Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanda Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanda Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wanda Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanda Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanda Fields. The network helps show where Wanda Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wanda Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wanda Fields Line = papers co-authored together Wanda Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200391
2 200558
3 199850
4 201446
5 199442
6 200539
7 201735
8 200832
9 199826
10 199923
11 201720
12 200118
13 201818
14 200417
15 201913
16 200812
17 20189
18 20198
19 19997
20 20174

About Wanda Fields

Wanda Fields is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Immunology and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (9 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (6 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (5 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (2 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (2 papers) and Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (182 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (129 citations), Molecular Biology (259 citations), Pharmacology (28 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (88 citations). Wanda Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Brian K. Nordskog, Gary M. Hellmann, Betsy Bombick, Alan J. Townsend, David J. Doolittle, Walter T. Morgan, Ying Li, Kathy Fowler, Charles S. Morrow and Brian M. Keyser. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology in Vitro, Carcinogenesis, Toxicology Reports, Toxicological Sciences and Experimental Lung Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact