Clive Meredith

79 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Clive Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Cancer Research 408
  • Physiology 572
  • Small Animals 134
  • Pharmacology 120
  • Immunology and Allergy 61
Replace Yasushi Kawasaki with:
Yasushi Kawasaki Japan
Byoung‐Seok Lee South Korea
Katsumi Fukamachi Japan
Mahmoud Mahmoudi Iran
Mi‐Ok Lee South Korea
Wenli Zhou China
Rabeah Abbas Al-Temaimi Kuwait
Edouard Delaive Belgium
Tomoki Fukuyama Japan
Damiën van Berlo Netherlands
Clive Meredith relative to Yasushi Kawasaki Japan Yasushi Kawasaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.5×
Yasushi Kawasaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Meredith. The network helps show where Clive Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive Meredith Line = papers co-authored together Clive Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015125
2 1998106
3 201393
4 201169
5 200366
6 201265
7 201556
8 201653
9 201448
10 201347
11 199945
12 201644
13 201341
14 201339
15 201536
16 201235
17 199732
18 201832
19 199829
20 201429

About Clive Meredith

Clive Meredith is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pharmacology, Immunology, Physiology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (29 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (14 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (12 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (9 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (6 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (408 citations), Physiology (572 citations), Small Animals (134 citations), Pharmacology (120 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (61 citations). Clive Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include David Thorne, Arturo Anadón, Mary P. Scott, Deborah Dillon, Annette Dalrymple, Ian Crooks, Stacy Fiebelkorn, Emmanuel Minet, Roger J. Price and Brian G. Lake. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology in Vitro, Toxicology Letters, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Toxicology and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact