Wake Smith

490 citations
16 papers · 305 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Climate Change and Geoengineering
    • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
    • Climate variability and models
    • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
    • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
    • Cryospheric studies and observations

Papers in

Wake Smith

16 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Wake Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Global and Planetary Change 276
  • Atmospheric Science 14
  • Economics and Econometrics 22
  • Information Systems and Management 5
  • History and Philosophy of Science 4
Replace Andy Parker with:
Andy Parker United States
Ailin Liang China
Patrick W. Hillyard Germany
Yujia You United States
Daniel Heyen Germany
Y. Sawa Japan
Ulrike Proske Germany
Elin Lundstadt Norway
Fredrik Ingemarson Sweden
M. Kübbeler Germany
Wake Smith relative to Andy Parker United States Andy Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Andy Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wake Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wake Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wake Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wake Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wake Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wake Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wake Smith. The network helps show where Wake Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Wake Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wake Smith Line = papers co-authored together Wake Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2018106
2 202062
3 202137
4 202017
5 202217
6 202216
7 202114
8 20246
9 20246
10 20245
11 20254
12
Pandora's Toolbox: The Hopes and Hazards of Climate Intervention
19703
13 20223
14 20223
15 20253
16 20253

About Wake Smith

Wake Smith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change and Geoengineering (14 papers) and Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (276 citations), Atmospheric Science (14 citations), Economics and Econometrics (22 citations), Information Systems and Management (5 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (4 citations). Wake Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gernot Wagner, Patrick Vogel, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Walker Lee, Douglas G. MacMartin, David W. Keith, Peter James Irvine, Michel C. Tsamados and Joshua B. Horton. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Research Communications, Environmental Research Letters, Earth s Future, Global Policy and Climatic Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact