Daniel Heyen

403 citations
14 papers · 207 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Heyen

13 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Daniel Heyen
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Global and Planetary Change 168
  • General Decision Sciences 3
  • Economics and Econometrics 26
  • Ecological Modeling 1
  • General Social Sciences 1
Replace Jane A. Flegal with:
Jane A. Flegal United States
Andy Parker United States
Christopher M. Barth United States
Tyler Felgenhauer United States
Albert Lin United States
Ailin Liang China
Natasha Landell-Mills United Kingdom
Claudio Araujo France
Wake Smith United States
Gabriela Simonet France
Daniel Heyen relative to Jane A. Flegal United States Jane A. Flegal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Jane A. Flegal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Heyen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Heyen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Heyen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Heyen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Heyen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Heyen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Heyen. The network helps show where Daniel Heyen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Heyen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Heyen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Heyen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 202043
2 201937
3 202137
4 201330
5 201526
6 201613
7 20217
8 20123
9 20213
10 20253
11 20152
12 20242
13 20141
14 20170

About Daniel Heyen

Daniel Heyen is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change and Geoengineering (9 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (1 paper), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Economic theories and models (1 paper) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (168 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations), Economics and Econometrics (26 citations), Ecological Modeling (1 citation) and General Social Sciences (1 citation). Daniel Heyen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Juan Moreno‐Cruz, Joshua B. Horton, Thilo Wiertz, Timo Goeschl, Katharine Ricke, Douglas G. MacMartin, Peter James Irvine, Antony Millner, Alessandro Tavoni and Florian Diekert. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental and Resource Economics, Theory and Decision, Nature Communications, American Economic Journal Microeconomics and Climatic Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact