W C Maples
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Papers in
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 7
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 1
- Journals
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (2 papers)Optometry and Vision Science (1 paper)Journal of Learning Disabilities (1 paper)Optometry (5 papers)PubMed (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
W C Maples
17 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Ophthalmology 36
- Epidemiology 134
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 10
- Social Psychology 47
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 21
Countries citing papers authored by W C Maples
This map shows the geographic impact of W C Maples's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W C Maples with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W C Maples more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W C Maples
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W C Maples. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W C Maples. The network helps show where W C Maples may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside W C Maples, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 41 | |
| 4 | A comparison of the visual symptoms between ADD/ADHD and normal children. | 2001 | 26 |
| 5 | Interrater and test-retest reliability of pursuits and saccades. | 1988 | 17 |
| 6 | Efficacy of vision therapy as assessed by the COVD quality of life checklist. | 2002 | 16 |
| 7 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 9 | Comparison of Distance and Near Heterophoria by Two Clinical Methods | 2009 | 13 |
| 10 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 12 | Accommodative facility test results and academic success in Polish second graders. | 1999 | 9 |
| 13 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 14 | The Wold Sentence Copy Test Academic Performance | 2003 | 4 |
| 15 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 16 | Optometric management of strabismus patients. | 1994 | 2 |
| 17 | 1998 | 2 |
About W C Maples
W C Maples is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (36 citations), Epidemiology (134 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (10 citations), Social Psychology (47 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (21 citations). W C Maples has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Sang Chul Park and Amanda Corbett. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Optometry and Vision Science, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Optometry and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.