Danielle Leong
Impact in
- Neurology top 10%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 6
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 2
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 4
- Co-authors
- Steven Galetta (5 shared papers)Laura J. Balcer (5 shared papers)Christina L. Master (3 shared papers)Kristin Galetta (1 shared paper)Mengling Liu (1 shared paper)Rachel E. Ventura (1 shared paper)David G. Watt (1 shared paper)Greg J. Evans (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMJ Open Ophthalmology (1 paper)Journal of Optometry (1 paper)Journal of Child Neurology (1 paper)Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (1 paper)Neurology Clinical Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Danielle Leong
12 papers receiving 376 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Neurology 193
- Emergency Medicine 122
- Epidemiology 326
- Ophthalmology 77
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 61
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Leong
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Leong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Leong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Leong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Leong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Leong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Leong. The network helps show where Danielle Leong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Leong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 117 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 96 | |
| 3 | The King-Devick test as a concussion screening tool administered by sports parents. | 2014 | 74 |
| 4 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 9 | Factors Predicting King-Devick Test Performance in Adults and Adolescents | 2015 | 1 |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 12 | Color Contrast Sensitivity in Age-Related Macular Degeneration(AMD) | 2018 | 1 |
About Danielle Leong
Danielle Leong is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (193 citations), Emergency Medicine (122 citations), Epidemiology (326 citations), Ophthalmology (77 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (61 citations). Danielle Leong has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven Galetta, Laura J. Balcer, Christina L. Master, Kristin Galetta, Mengling Liu, Rachel E. Ventura, David G. Watt, Greg J. Evans, Amaal J. Starling and Bert B. Vargas. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open Ophthalmology, Journal of Optometry, Journal of Child Neurology, Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology and Neurology Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.