Vincent Luo

19 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Vincent Luo
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Aging 13
  • Developmental Neuroscience 21
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 86
  • Business and International Management 9
  • Molecular Biology 312
Replace Deborah Y. Kwon with:
Deborah Y. Kwon United States
Colette Moses Australia
Xiaobing Qing Germany
In Young Choi South Korea
L. Benjamin Hills United States
Daniela Karra Italy
Princess C. Elhosary United States
Leo Otsuki United Kingdom
Stephen Tran United States
Jeremy W. Linsley United States
Vincent Luo relative to Deborah Y. Kwon United States Deborah Y. Kwon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Deborah Y. Kwon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vincent Luo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent Luo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent Luo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent Luo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent Luo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent Luo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent Luo. The network helps show where Vincent Luo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vincent Luo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vincent Luo Line = papers co-authored together Vincent Luo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2016108
2 201759
3 201048
4 201140
5 201834
6 201629
7 201620
8 201019
9 201116
10 201415
11 201214
12 201114
13 202113
14 202213
15 20238
16 20225
17 20251
18 20191
19
Analytical solution of cold-air-drainage flow within and above forest canopy
20091
20 20220

About Vincent Luo

Vincent Luo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Immunology and Physiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers) and PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (13 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (21 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (86 citations), Business and International Management (9 citations) and Molecular Biology (312 citations). Vincent Luo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Melinda K. Kutzing, Bonnie L. Firestein, Jane A. Skok, Ramya Raviram, Pedro P. Rocha, Christopher G. Langhammer, Yi Fu, Yan Deng, Esteban O. Mazzoni and Richard Bonneau. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Science Advances, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Scientific Reports and Current Neuropharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact