Veerle Buffel

892 citations
47 papers · 576 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Health top 5%
    • Health disparities and outcomes
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Employment and Welfare Studies
    • Global Health Care Issues

Papers in

Veerle Buffel

44 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Veerle Buffel
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Health 119
  • General Health Professions 207
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Demography 48
  • Social Psychology 73
Replace Natalie Galucia with:
Natalie Galucia United States
Emma Swinford United States
Amanda M. Kalamar United States
Maria da Penha de Lima Coutinho Brazil
Valerie Elliot Canada
Patricia Flynn Weitzman United States
Laura Hietapakka Finland
Jane H. White United States
Stacey McCrary United States
Roberta J. Ogletree United States
Veerle Buffel relative to Natalie Galucia United States Natalie Galucia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×
Natalie Galucia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Veerle Buffel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Veerle Buffel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veerle Buffel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veerle Buffel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Veerle Buffel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veerle Buffel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veerle Buffel. The network helps show where Veerle Buffel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Veerle Buffel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Veerle Buffel Line = papers co-authored together Veerle Buffel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201556
2 201540
3 201539
4 202137
5 201632
6 202030
7 201727
8 201527
9 201522
10 201722
11 201420
12 201719
13 201815
14 201715
15 202014
16 202114
17 202214
18 202212
19 202312
20 202211

About Veerle Buffel

Veerle Buffel is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 47 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (119 citations), General Health Professions (207 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations), Demography (48 citations) and Social Psychology (73 citations). Veerle Buffel has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Cambodia and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Piet Bracke, Sarah M. Van de Velde, Katrijn Delaruelle, Edwin Wouters, Sarah Missinne, Koen Van der Bracht, Josefien van Olmen, Jason Beckfield, Lesley Hustinx and Srean Chhim. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal for Equity in Health, European Sociological Review, Health Sociology Review and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact