European Sociological Review

1.6k papers and 58.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in European Sociological Review in the last decades have received a total of 58.4k indexed citations. Papers published in European Sociological Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.1k papers), Political Science and International Relations (449 papers) and Gender Studies (299 papers) specifically the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (362 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (311 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (230 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Sociological Review are Carina Mood, Richard Breen, Peer Scheepers, John H. Goldthorpe, Catherine Hakim, Stefan Svallfors, Morten Blekesaune, Matthijs Kalmijn, Jan Delhey and Silke L. Schneider.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Sociological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Sociological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Sociological Review.

Countries where authors publish in European Sociological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Sociological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Sociological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Sociological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025