George Boolos

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

George Boolos
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Theoretical Computer Science 206
  • History and Philosophy of Science 674
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.2k
  • Philosophy 596
Replace John P. Burgess with:
John P. Burgess United States
Charles D. Parsons United States
Dag Prawitz Sweden
Kurt Gödel United States
Geoffrey Hellman United States
Joseph R. Shoenfield United States
Arthur N. Prior New Zealand
Helena Rasiowa Poland
Penelope Maddy United States
J. H. Woodger United Kingdom
George Boolos relative to John P. Burgess United States John P. Burgess's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
John P. Burgess · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Boolos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Boolos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Boolos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Boolos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Boolos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Boolos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Boolos. The network helps show where George Boolos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside George Boolos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Boolos Line = papers co-authored together George Boolos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002402
2 1984375
3 1984261
4 1971247
5 2000164
6 1985157
7 2007144
8 1975110
9
The Unprovability of Consistency: An Essay in Modal Logic
197978
10
Computability and logic: 3rd ed.
198971
11
Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam
200964
12 198449
13 198942
14 198742
15 197940
16 198038
17 198737
18 198535
19 199734
20 196934

About George Boolos

George Boolos is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (16 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (10 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (206 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (674 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.2k citations) and Philosophy (596 citations). George Boolos has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and China. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Jeffrey, John P. Burgess, Raymond M. Smullyan, Giovanni Sambin, Hilary Putnam, Richard G. Heck, Vann McGee and Sy D. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Studia Logica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact