Ute Splittgerber
Impact in
- Food Science top 10%
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Sensory Systems top 10%
Papers in
-
- Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies 6
-
- Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis 2
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 2
- Co-authors
- Craig M. Crews (2 shared papers)Peter Weyerstahl (11 shared papers)Helga Marschall (11 shared papers)Jayhyuk Myung (1 shared paper)Royce Mohan (1 shared paper)Mikael Elofsson (1 shared paper)Kathleen M. McKenzie (3 shared papers)Michael B. Lazarus (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Flavour and Fragrance Journal (8 papers)Angewandte Chemie International Edition (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Trends in Biochemical Sciences (1 paper)Liebigs Annalen (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Ute Splittgerber
17 papers receiving 671 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Food Science 142
- Sensory Systems 33
- Molecular Biology 431
- Biotechnology 51
- Oncology 137
Countries citing papers authored by Ute Splittgerber
This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Splittgerber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Splittgerber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Splittgerber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Splittgerber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Splittgerber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Splittgerber. The network helps show where Ute Splittgerber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Ute Splittgerber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 117 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 106 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 65 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 32 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 |
About Ute Splittgerber
Ute Splittgerber is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Biochemistry, Food Science, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (6 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (5 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (4 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (2 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (2 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (142 citations), Sensory Systems (33 citations), Molecular Biology (431 citations), Biotechnology (51 citations) and Oncology (137 citations). Ute Splittgerber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Craig M. Crews, Peter Weyerstahl, Helga Marschall, Jayhyuk Myung, Royce Mohan, Mikael Elofsson, Kathleen M. McKenzie, Michael B. Lazarus, David G. Johnston and David J. Austin. Their work appears in journals such as Flavour and Fragrance Journal, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Trends in Biochemical Sciences and Liebigs Annalen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.