Ursula Fuller
Impact in
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Media Technology top 5%
- Experimental Learning in Engineering
Papers in
- Education 13
- Online and Blended Learning 5
- Higher Education Learning Practices 4
- Educational Assessment and Pedagogy 3
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 5
- Open Education and E-Learning 4
- Co-authors
- Colin G. Johnson (3 shared papers)Charles Riedesel (3 shared papers)Tracy L. Lewis (2 shared papers)Isidoro Hernán Losada (2 shared papers)D. Thompson (2 shared papers)Errol Thompson (2 shared papers)Jana Jacková (2 shared papers)Tuukka Ahoniemi (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (3 papers)ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandSweden
In The Last Decade
Ursula Fuller
17 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Computer Science Applications 291
- Media Technology 106
- Software 37
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 112
- Information Systems 119
Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Fuller
This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Fuller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Fuller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Fuller. The network helps show where Ursula Fuller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ursula Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 175 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 12 | Should we assess our students' attitudes? | 2007 | 6 |
| 13 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 |
About Ursula Fuller
Ursula Fuller is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Media Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (5 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (3 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (3 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (291 citations), Media Technology (106 citations), Software (37 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (112 citations) and Information Systems (119 citations). Ursula Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Colin G. Johnson, Charles Riedesel, Tracy L. Lewis, Isidoro Hernán Losada, D. Thompson, Errol Thompson, Jana Jacková, Tuukka Ahoniemi, Diana Cukierman and Essi Lahtinen. Their work appears in journals such as Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) and ACM SIGCSE Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.