Udo Schmidt

44 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Udo Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Clinical Biochemistry 96
  • Aging 23
  • Molecular Biology 768
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 33
  • Nephrology 69
Replace Mihee Kim with:
Mihee Kim South Korea
Eva Müller Germany
Hye‐Jeong Park South Korea
Akira Yamashita Japan
Hiroaki Miyazaki Japan
Meidong Liu China
Souad R. Sennoune United States
Guojian Jiang China
Yanhua Li China
Jingjing He China
Udo Schmidt relative to Mihee Kim South Korea Mihee Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Mihee Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Udo Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Schmidt. The network helps show where Udo Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Udo Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Udo Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Udo Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998207
2 2018177
3 2003131
4 1976126
5 198593
6 197687
7 200775
8 199565
9 197460
10 201659
11 201650
12 199045
13
Diagnostic significance of enzymes and proteins in urine.
197943
14 197137
15 198534
16 197030
17 201829
18 197721
19 198020
20 201019

About Udo Schmidt

Udo Schmidt is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (11 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (8 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (8 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (4 papers), Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (4 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (96 citations), Aging (23 citations), Molecular Biology (768 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (33 citations) and Nephrology (69 citations). Udo Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include W Guder, Ulf Ståhl, Andreas Bund, Karola Lehmann, U. C. Dubach, Mario Kurniawan, Michael Stich, Rudolf Taube, Karl Esser and Ulrich Kück. Their work appears in journals such as Electrochimica Acta, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biological Chemistry and Journal of Applied Electrochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact