T.R. Oakes

1.5k citations
31 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

T.R. Oakes

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

T.R. Oakes
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 580
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 73
  • Biological Psychiatry 49
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 259
  • Sensory Systems 57
Replace Paul Gravel with:
Paul Gravel Canada
Karmen K. Yoder United States
Vincent Beliveau Denmark
Lieuwe Appel Sweden
Peter Kalus Germany
Céline Risterucci Switzerland
Eileen M. Kemether United States
Jason Smucny United States
Markus Savli Austria
Shi-Yu Zhou China
T.R. Oakes relative to Paul Gravel Canada Paul Gravel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Paul Gravel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.R. Oakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.R. Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.R. Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.R. Oakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.R. Oakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.R. Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.R. Oakes. The network helps show where T.R. Oakes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.R. Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.R. Oakes Line = papers co-authored together T.R. Oakes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004304
2 2003239
3 2005150
4 2006110
5 199980
6 200877
7
Fluorine-18-fluoro-L-DOPA dosimetry with carbidopa pretreatment.
199849
8 201631
9 200829
10 200927
11 199525
12 202022
13 199219
14 199815
15 199815
16 199413
17 199411
18 19939
19 20087
20 20096

About T.R. Oakes

T.R. Oakes is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (580 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (73 citations), Biological Psychiatry (49 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (259 citations) and Sensory Systems (57 citations). T.R. Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Davidson, Andrew S. Fox, Moo Kwon Chung, Diego Pizzagalli, Heather C. Abercrombie, Christine L. Larson, Ruth M. Benca, Stacey M. Schaefer, Andrew S. Fox and Steven E. Shelton. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, NeuroImage, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Brain Research and Applied Radiation and Isotopes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact