Tom Piek

2.6k citations
109 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Piek

108 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Tom Piek
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Insect Science 1.4k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Genetics 872
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 551
  • Pharmacology 420
Replace Maria‐Dolors Piulachs with:
Maria‐Dolors Piulachs Spain
Jurgen Huybrechts Belgium
Eliahu Zlotkin Israel
Hironori Ishizaki Japan
Roger Huybrechts Belgium
Timothy A. Richmond United States
Walter E. Bollenbacher United States
Neil Audsley United Kingdom
Theodore R. F. Wright United States
W. Rathmayer Germany
Tom Piek relative to Maria‐Dolors Piulachs Spain Maria‐Dolors Piulachs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Maria‐Dolors Piulachs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Piek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Piek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Piek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Piek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Piek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Piek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Piek. The network helps show where Tom Piek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Piek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Piek Line = papers co-authored together Tom Piek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990278
2
Venoms of the Hymenoptera: biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural aspects.
1986117
3 198697
4 198277
5 197771
6 199160
7 199157
8 196456
9 198254
10 197154
11 198747
12 199043
13 198639
14 199036
15 199235
16 198735
17 196932
18 197830
19 196629
20 197927

About Tom Piek

Tom Piek is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Pharmacology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (58 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (55 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (35 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (21 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (10 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Genetics (872 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (551 citations) and Pharmacology (420 citations). Tom Piek has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include P. Mantel, Willem Spanjer, Bernard Hue, Jan van Marle, M. Pelhate, Terumi Nakajima, Tadashi Yasuhara, Henk Karst, R.L. Veenendaal and T. E. May. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicon, Journal of Insect Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Pharmacology and Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact