Tom Loeys

133 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Tom Loeys
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Statistics and Probability 388
  • Applied Psychology 183
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 443
  • Clinical Psychology 642
  • Social Psychology 554
Replace Elizabeth L. Ogburn with:
Elizabeth L. Ogburn United States
Valerie Williams United States
Rusan Chen United States
Joseph R. Rausch United States
Donna L. Coffman United States
Rachel T. Fouladi United States
Carlos G. Forero Spain
Andrew R. Morral United States
Satoshi Usami Japan
Tom Loeys relative to Elizabeth L. Ogburn United States Elizabeth L. Ogburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elizabeth L. Ogburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Loeys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Loeys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Loeys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Loeys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Loeys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Loeys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Loeys. The network helps show where Tom Loeys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Loeys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Loeys Line = papers co-authored together Tom Loeys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008199
2 2017182
3 2011141
4 2018117
5 201589
6 201786
7 201684
8 202083
9 201574
10 201070
11 200369
12 200664
13 201764
14 200947
15 201344
16 201341
17 201441
18 200736
19 201736
20 201636

About Tom Loeys

Tom Loeys is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 135 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (27 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (24 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (18 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (17 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (12 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (388 citations), Applied Psychology (183 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (443 citations), Clinical Psychology (642 citations) and Social Psychology (554 citations). Tom Loeys has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Beatrijs Moerkerke, Stijn Vansteelandt, Ann Buysse, Olivia De Smet, Johan Steen, Els Goetghebeur, Melanie J. Davies, Samuel S. Engel, Russell Scott and Ernst H. W. Koster. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Family Violence, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology and Multivariate Behavioral Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact