Jonathan Remue

1.1k citations
20 papers · 853 · h-index 15

Impact in

  • Neurology top 2%
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Papers in

Jonathan Remue

20 papers receiving 827 citations

Peers

Jonathan Remue
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Neurology 415
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 337
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 193
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 44
  • Applied Psychology 42
Replace Natasha Radhu with:
Natasha Radhu Canada
Nicola Großheinrich Germany
Carlos Ventura‐Bort Germany
Larissa Wolkenstein Germany
Myriam Vervaet Belgium
Jodie Naim‐Feil Israel
Melanie Canterberry United States
Laura B. Bragdon United States
Juergen Baudewig Germany
Stephan Goerigk Germany
Jonathan Remue relative to Natasha Radhu Canada Natasha Radhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Natasha Radhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Remue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Remue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Remue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Remue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Remue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Remue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Remue. The network helps show where Jonathan Remue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Remue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Remue Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Remue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2014147
2 2013104
3 201388
4 201470
5 201362
6 201852
7 201450
8 201549
9 201637
10 201537
11 201736
12 201733
13 201425
14 201818
15 201817
16 202113
17 202110
18 20213
19 20231
20 20221

About Jonathan Remue

Jonathan Remue is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (415 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (337 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (193 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations) and Applied Psychology (42 citations). Jonathan Remue has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rudi De Raedt, Chris Baeken, Marie–Anne Vanderhasselt, Jan De Houwer, Guo‐Rong Wu, Sean Hughes, Sara De Witte, André R. Brunoni, Johan De Mey and Robert Luypaert. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neuropsychologia, Neuropsychology, Cognitive Therapy and Research and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact