Tom E. C. Smith

46 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Tom E. C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 231
  • Safety Research 269
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 155
  • Education 305
  • Human-Computer Interaction 57
Replace Karen A. Erickson with:
Karen A. Erickson United States
Bojana Kuzmanovic Germany
Jana Schaich Borg United States
Moira Konrad United States
Chris Abbott United States
Carlos Fernandes da Silva Portugal
Tabitha W. Payne United States
Pandelis Perakakis Spain
Chunliang Feng China
Eugene Aidman Australia
Tom E. C. Smith relative to Karen A. Erickson United States Karen A. Erickson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.0×
Karen A. Erickson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom E. C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom E. C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom E. C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom E. C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom E. C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom E. C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom E. C. Smith. The network helps show where Tom E. C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom E. C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom E. C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Tom E. C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994325
2
Teaching Students with Special Needs in Inclusive Settings
1994191
3 198771
4 201066
5 200535
6 198632
7 199023
8 199721
9 196121
10 200116
11 199415
12 199515
13 201515
14 199614
15 200813
16 199912
17 200011
18 200211
19 199710
20 198810

About Tom E. C. Smith

Tom E. C. Smith is a scholar working on Education, Safety Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Education and Employment (15 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (5 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (231 citations), Safety Research (269 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (155 citations), Education (305 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (57 citations). Tom E. C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Judith M. Holt, Howard P. Parette, Clarence A. Ellis, Gail L. Rein, Peter J. Cook, Dianne Zager, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Richard L. Simpson, Edward A. Polloway and Karrie A. Shogren. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Disabilities, Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities, Remedial and Special Education, Assessment for Effective Intervention and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact