Donald E. Frederick
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 5
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 3
- Workplace Health and Well-being 2
- Co-authors
- Tyler J. VanderWeele (5 shared papers)Leslie M. Kay (5 shared papers)Amanda Brown (1 shared paper)Neil Mehta (1 shared paper)John F. Helliwell (2 shared papers)Dorota Węziak‐Białowolska (2 shared papers)Eric S. Kim (2 shared papers)Laura D. Kubzansky (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Behavioral Neuroscience (2 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (1 paper)Preventive Medicine (1 paper)JAMA Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Donald E. Frederick
12 papers receiving 584 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Sensory Systems 156
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 127
- Social Psychology 140
- Cognitive Neuroscience 110
- Health 42
Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Frederick
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Frederick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Frederick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. The network helps show where Donald E. Frederick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald E. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 140 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 138 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 12 | Increased job crafting is positively associated with work engagement: a longitudinal meta-analysis | 2017 | 2 |
| 13 | 2026 | 0 |
About Donald E. Frederick
Donald E. Frederick is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, General Health Professions, Health, Social Psychology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (156 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (127 citations), Social Psychology (140 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations) and Health (42 citations). Donald E. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tyler J. VanderWeele, Leslie M. Kay, Amanda Brown, Neil Mehta, John F. Helliwell, Dorota Węziak‐Białowolska, Eric S. Kim, Laura D. Kubzansky, Louis Tay and Colin Farrelly. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Preventive Medicine and JAMA Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.