Donald E. Frederick
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 5
-
- Employment and Welfare Studies 3
- Workplace Health and Well-being 2
- Co-authors
- Tyler J. VanderWeele (4 shared papers)Leslie M. Kay (5 shared papers)Amanda Brown (1 shared paper)Neil Mehta (1 shared paper)Seth Margolis (1 shared paper)Paul Allin (1 shared paper)Matthew T. Lee (1 shared paper)Guy Fletcher (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)Behavioral Neuroscience (2 papers)Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)JAMA Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Donald E. Frederick
11 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Sensory Systems 149
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 121
- Social Psychology 127
- Cognitive Neuroscience 107
- Health 39
Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Frederick
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Frederick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Frederick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. The network helps show where Donald E. Frederick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald E. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 137 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 11 | Increased job crafting is positively associated with work engagement: a longitudinal meta-analysis | 2017 | 2 |
| 12 | 2026 | 0 |
About Donald E. Frederick
Donald E. Frederick is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, General Health Professions, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper) and Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (149 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (121 citations), Social Psychology (127 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (107 citations) and Health (39 citations). Donald E. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tyler J. VanderWeele, Leslie M. Kay, Amanda Brown, Neil Mehta, Seth Margolis, Paul Allin, Matthew T. Lee, Guy Fletcher, Laura D. Kubzansky and Claudia Trudel‐Fitzgerald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and JAMA Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.