Tobe Freeman
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 6
- Neural dynamics and brain function 6
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Co-authors
- Frank Sengpiel (4 shared papers)Roland Baddeley (2 shared papers)Matteo Carandini (2 shared papers)L. F. Abbott (1 shared paper)Edmund T. Rolls (1 shared paper)Séverine Durand (1 shared paper)Daniel Kiper (1 shared paper)Colin Blakemore (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuroreport (2 papers)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (1 paper)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)Visual Neuroscience (1 paper)Vision Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tobe Freeman
12 papers receiving 718 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 650
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 309
- Biophysics 35
- Sensory Systems 25
- Ophthalmology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Tobe Freeman
This map shows the geographic impact of Tobe Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tobe Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobe Freeman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tobe Freeman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tobe Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tobe Freeman. The network helps show where Tobe Freeman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tobe Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 322 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 172 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 124 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 |
About Tobe Freeman
Tobe Freeman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Color Science and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (650 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (309 citations), Biophysics (35 citations), Sensory Systems (25 citations) and Ophthalmology (31 citations). Tobe Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Sengpiel, Roland Baddeley, Matteo Carandini, L. F. Abbott, Edmund T. Rolls, Séverine Durand, Daniel Kiper, Colin Blakemore, R A Harrad and Richard F. Mark. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroreport, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Visual Neuroscience and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.