Daniel Kiper

3.8k citations
55 papers · 2.9k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Kiper

52 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Daniel Kiper
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.2k
  • Rehabilitation 321
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 627
  • Social Psychology 499
  • Human-Computer Interaction 129
Replace N. Jeremy Hill with:
N. Jeremy Hill United States
C.C.A.M. Gielen Netherlands
Javier Cudeiro Spain
Mark E. McCourt United States
Duje Tadin United States
W. Wolf Germany
Douglas Cheyne Canada
James Ashe United States
Manfred Fahle Germany
Uri Polat Israel
Daniel Kiper relative to N. Jeremy Hill United States N. Jeremy Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
N. Jeremy Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kiper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kiper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kiper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kiper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kiper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kiper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kiper. The network helps show where Daniel Kiper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Kiper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Kiper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Kiper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998288
2 1997217
3 2003188
4 2002172
5 1996170
6 1992150
7 1994142
8 2007133
9 1997132
10 201393
11 199691
12 201390
13 200786
14 199882
15 201072
16 201565
17 200264
18 201861
19 200959
20 199359

About Daniel Kiper

Daniel Kiper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Social Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (25 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (6 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.2k citations), Rehabilitation (321 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (627 citations), Social Psychology (499 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (129 citations). Daniel Kiper has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Karl R. Gegenfurtner, Lynne Kiorpes, Suzanne Fenstemaker, J. Anthony Movshon, Jonathan B. Levitt, Matteo Carandini, Kynan Eng, Lawrence P. O’Keefe, James R. Cavanaugh and Paul F. M. J. Verschure. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, European Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Vision, Visual Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact