Tint Lwin

2.0k citations
43 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Tint Lwin

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Tint Lwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cancer Research 431
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 182
  • Molecular Biology 654
  • Immunology 194
  • Genetics 85
Replace Lorraine Tracey with:
Lorraine Tracey United States
Floyd H. Thompson United States
Ashley Smith United States
Chadd E. Nesbit United States
Akinori Yoda Japan
Anabel Heiniger Spain
Gabriel Bretones Spain
Hena R. Ashar United States
M Wada United States
Anke Sparmann Germany
Tint Lwin relative to Lorraine Tracey United States Lorraine Tracey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lorraine Tracey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tint Lwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tint Lwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tint Lwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tint Lwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tint Lwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tint Lwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tint Lwin. The network helps show where Tint Lwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tint Lwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tint Lwin Line = papers co-authored together Tint Lwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010272
2 2011137
3 201396
4 200788
5 201079
6 201073
7 200770
8 201359
9 200849
10 199446
11
Glycyrrhizin as a promoter of the late signal transduction for interleukin-2 production by splenic lymphocytes.
199345
12 198621
13 200316
14 20069
15 20138
16 20217
17 19926
18
Back From the Brink: Ex-situ Conservation and Recovery of the Critically Endangered Burmese Star Tortoise(Geochelone platynota) in Myanmar.
20175
19 20195
20
Allotype-linked immune response genes: roles in network control of the immune system.
19914

About Tint Lwin

Tint Lwin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Immunology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turtle Biology and Conservation (9 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (5 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (4 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (431 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (182 citations), Molecular Biology (654 citations), Immunology (194 citations) and Genetics (85 citations). Tint Lwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jianguo Tao, Lynn C. Moscinski, Eduardo M. Sotomayor, William S. Dalton, Jianhong Lin, Sophie Dessureault, X Zhang, Hua Yang, Dorna Rezania and William Kong. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Leukemia, Oryx, Chelonian Conservation and Biology and Immunobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact