Tim Reeskens

3.6k citations
86 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Reeskens

79 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Tim Reeskens
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.7k
  • Health 163
  • Gender Studies 155
  • Demography 189
Replace Bram Lancee with:
Bram Lancee Netherlands
Martin Kroh Germany
Wil Arts Netherlands
Stefan Liebig Germany
Andrew C. Eggers United States
Kazimierz M. Słomczyński United States
Peter Thisted Dinesen Denmark
Loek Halman Netherlands
Benjamin J. Newman United States
Janelle Wong United States
Tim Reeskens relative to Bram Lancee Netherlands Bram Lancee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Bram Lancee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Reeskens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Reeskens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Reeskens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Reeskens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Reeskens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Reeskens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Reeskens. The network helps show where Tim Reeskens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Reeskens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Reeskens Line = papers co-authored together Tim Reeskens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008304
2 2007207
3 2010179
4 2012178
5 2008121
6 2018116
7 201393
8 201383
9 201273
10 201272
11 201670
12 200769
13
The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness
201768
14 201355
15 202051
16 201547
17 200943
18 201240
19 201335
20 201629

About Tim Reeskens

Tim Reeskens is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Capital and Networks (21 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (19 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (10 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.7k citations), Health (163 citations), Gender Studies (155 citations) and Demography (189 citations). Tim Reeskens has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc Hooghe, Wim van Oorschot, Matthew Wright, Ann Trappers, Dietlind Stolle, Bart Meuleman, Tom van der Meer, Leen Vandecasteele, Marc Helbling and Femke Roosma. Their work appears in journals such as European Sociological Review, Journal of European Public Policy, Social Indicators Research, Nations and Nationalism and European Societies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact