Tim Noblet

683 citations
35 papers · 457 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Noblet

30 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Tim Noblet
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 41
  • General Health Professions 164
  • Family Practice 11
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 9
  • Occupational Therapy 18
Replace Adélia Yaeko Kyosen Nakatani with:
Adélia Yaeko Kyosen Nakatani Brazil
Lotte Verweij Netherlands
Geoff Harding United Kingdom
Karleen F. Giannitrapani United States
Aileen McIntosh United Kingdom
Karla L. Seaman Australia
Delyth Higman James United Kingdom
Ellen M. Pinholt United States
David B. Brushwood United States
Cédric Mabire Switzerland
Tim Noblet relative to Adélia Yaeko Kyosen Nakatani Brazil Adélia Yaeko Kyosen Nakatani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.6×
Adélia Yaeko Kyosen Nakatani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Noblet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Noblet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Noblet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Noblet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Noblet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Noblet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Noblet. The network helps show where Tim Noblet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Noblet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Noblet Line = papers co-authored together Tim Noblet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201875
2 201961
3 201746
4 201836
5 201935
6 201931
7 202025
8 202017
9 202315
10 202114
11 202014
12 201811
13 201911
14 20239
15 20198
16 20208
17 20208
18 20196
19 20195
20 20244

About Tim Noblet

Tim Noblet is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Occupational Therapy, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (12 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (41 citations), General Health Professions (164 citations), Family Practice (11 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (9 citations) and Occupational Therapy (18 citations). Tim Noblet has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alison Rushton, John Francis Marriott, Nicola R Heneghan, Julia M. Hush, Mark Jonathan Hancock, Verity Pacey, Andrew Georgiou, Lindsey Brett, Mikaela L Jorgensen and Debra Shirley. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, PLoS ONE, Physiotherapy, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and Musculoskeletal Science and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact